Worship: Contemporary vs. Traditional by Clay Hecocks

 

March 2001

The last several years have seen a proliferation and popularity of Praise and Worship music that have been unprecedented. As churches nationwide have struggled to infuse their fellowships with newer, younger members, the clash between the "founders", who for the most part are satisfied and content with the ways things are, and the younger, newer members, who essentially have been raised on change and are ready and insistent upon just that, is intensifying. There’s nothing inherently wrong with either group’s desire, unless it is vehemently defended with stubborn ignorance. Unfortunately, this is the very core of many a church split.

I have had a unique opportunity to see and experience both sides. At the age of 14, I took my first position in music ministry as a church organist. I only played hymns with the rare exception of a halfhearted attempt at a "contemporary chorus." This was in the early 70’s. I must admit, many of the hymns were a pleasure to play and to sing, and many had a depth lyrically that is hard to find today, but many were boring, endless, and seemed to just lay there. Much of the same is true for contemporary worship. In most of the contemporary worship that is offered today, I find mindless and trite lyrics, poorly crafted melodies, and terrible musicianship, but more on that in a future column. As years went by, my taste for music changed as did the times, and I began to listen to and enjoy various styles of music, including rock, pop, some jazz, and even disco (what can I say?) - all while majoring in piano performance and practicing classical music everyday. At one point in my life, I was studying classical music in graduate school, playing in a rock band, playing a piano bar on weekends, and playing hymns on an organ at church on Sunday! Following that I was the minister of music at a traditional church that charged me with the responsibility of transitioning a traditional worship style to a more contemporary style, experiencing firsthand the wrath of both sides. The reason I share all of this is to make it known that I have played and enjoyed both contemporary and traditional music, and to hear the question, "Which do you like better?" is harder to answer than the question, "Who do you like better, your mom or your dad?"

Both contemporary and traditional styles have validity, value, and purpose. However, the trend seems to be separating one from the other, similar to throwing out the baby with the bath water. This unfortunate disparity is clearly evidenced in the recent trend of split services; that is, churches that offer both a contemporary service and a traditional service on the same Sunday morning. I have often wondered if this is a knee-jerk reaction designed to ruffle the least amount of feathers and keep the "founders" (often significant givers) pacified, while at the same time providing something for the younger members who might otherwise be tempted to look elsewhere, thus bolstering the size and economic base of the church. Does this solve the problem or is it another .com investment? In I Corinthians 12:12-26 we read Paul’s exhortation to the church to behave and respond as one body acknowledging all its parts, and in verse 25 to not have any division in the body. The logic of split services flies in the face of these Scriptures. Psalm 141:4 says, "One generation will commend your works to another; they will tell of your mighty acts." In split services, one generation will be separated from another. What happens is a polarization: "I go to the contemporary service, it’s so relevant," or "You should try the traditional service, it’s beautiful and reverent," and so on. Plain and simple, it sure seems like division to me.

Why not a worship service that employs hymns and contemporary worship songs together? Not one or the other, but both combined. Here’s the result: by including some hymns, even arranged in a current style, those of the traditional bent will see a respect for what they love and enjoy and thus have a tendency to be more open to the music and style of those of the contemporary bent, and vice versa. It works and produces fruit, this I know. The other benefit is that God’s people grow up spiritually. Instead of two halves selfishly getting their own way, now one body is learning to love and accept all of its parts.

For your prayerful consideration,

Clay Hecocks

 

for questions or comments on this site, please contact dustinh@calvaryftl.org